Friday, March 31, 2006

Who's Ass Is Your Head Up?

"I am absolutely certain Connecticut is going to have the good sense to send Joe Lieberman back to the U.S. Senate so he can continue to serve on our behalf," he (Barack Obama) said.


Quite honestly, I do not understand why so many people fawn over this guy (Obama) so much. He may be an eloquent speaker, but he's still an asshole as a Democratic politician.

Ignored

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - A letter from President Bush to Iraq's supreme Shiite spiritual leader, Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, was hand-delivered earlier this week but sits unread and untranslated in the top religious figure's office, a key al-Sistani aide told The Associated Press on Thursday.

The aide - who has never allowed use of his name in news reports, citing al-Sistani's refusal to make any public statements himself - said the ayatollah had laid the letter aside and did not ask for a translation because of increasing ``unhappiness'' over what senior Shiite leaders see as American meddling in Iraqi attempts to form their first, permanent post-invasion government.

I wish it were as easy to ignore the man, here.

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Assume The Position


I was going to just let this shit pass, but firedoglake had a comment I though was too hysterical to let pass.

The sculptor does not seem to realize this is the position you assume to give a blow job, not birth.

Someone had to say it.

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

More Lies Passed On By Reporters

Bush, a former Texas governor who speaks Spanish, increased his share of the Hispanic vote to more than 40 percent in 2004, up from 35 percent in 2000. Republican Bob Dole won just 21 percent of the Hispanic vote in the 1996 presidential race.


Apparently another lie just tossed out there. Hat tip to Kos, who points out that Bush does not speak Spanish.

But who cares, right? Certainly not John Whitesides, Political Correspondent. A little lie here, a little lie there, and that's how they misinform the public they are supposed to serve. Stupid is as stupid does, as they say.

Another Wingnut Lies About Baghdad

Maybe congressional candidate Howard Kaloogian's website is just being deluged by visitors trying to get a look at the picture he took of "Baghdad" on his recent sight-seeing visit. But it sure looks like his campaign has taken the page in question off the site. (Needless to say, we archived a copy.) Sure looks like this bozo was trying to pass off a picture from Turkey as one showing how great things are going in Baghdad. We shall see.

Josh nails it. A Bozo trying to pass off a picture of a city in Turkey for Baghdad! These people just fucking lie, lie, lie. I don't get it, because I'm simply not that stupid. However, given the popularity of Fox News, and other right wing propaganda machines, there apparently are a lot of stupid people that just suck up this lying shit.

Where's the plumber with that snake, when you need him?

Still Waiting For Bill Napoli To Define "Simple Rape"

The President of the Oglala Sioux Tribe on the Pine Ridge Reservation, Cecilia Fire Thunder, was incensed. A former nurse and healthcare giver she was very angry that a state body made up mostly of white males, would make such a stupid law against women.

"To me, it is now a question of sovereignty," she said to me last week. "I will personally establish a Planned Parenthood clinic on my own land which is within the boundaries of the Pine Ridge Reservation where the State of South Dakota has absolutely no jurisdiction."

Finally, a reaction. It would come from a place that was immune to jurisdictional laws of South Dakota. Good for her, too. I hope she does work out an arrangement with Planned Parenthood, and sets up a clinic on the reservation.

When Governor Mike Rounds signed HB 1215 into law it effectively banned all abortions in the state with the exception that it did allow saving the mother's life. There were, however, no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. His actions, and the comments of State Senators like Bill Napoli of Rapid City, SD, set of a maelstrom of protests within the state.

Napoli suggested that if it was a case of "simple rape," there should be no thoughts of ending a pregnancy. Letters by the hundreds appeared in local newspapers, mostly written by women, challenging Napoli's description of rape as "simple." He has yet to explain satisfactorily what he meant by "simple rape."

Of course, it would be men that would attach the word simple with the word rape, and then make a statement that in the case of simple rape a woman should not be allowed the option to abort the fetus.

Disgusting is the only word I can come up with. Women better get their shit together, or we'll see the repeal of the right to vote in the not so distant future. Here's my plan. Let's perform a simple vasectomy on those simple male politicians in South Dakota. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Half-million protesters peacefully clog L.A. streets

So, the crowd estimte was 500,000. That's a rather large crowd, any way you look at it. I like this quote from one of the participants:

Gonzalez rejected claims by advocates of the legislation that it would help protect the nation from terrorism, noting that it would hurt Hispanics the most.

"When did you ever see a Mexican blow up the World Trade Center?" he said. "Who do you think built the World Trade Center?"

This continent was populated by brown skinned people long before any of the caucasian conquerors came over from Europe. I find it interesting that "white" culture today has corrupted even some "brown" culture into believing "illegal" immigration is this country's number one problem. I cringe every time I hear people talk about "not rewarding" those here illegally because they "broke the law." The very same politicians that spout that crap are usually the ones that "broke" laws in their position, and have been rewarded. Think: majority of the Republican party in Washington at this moment.

My grandmother came over "on the boat" as they say. I am only a second generation AMERICAN. Many of these so called supporters of immigration reform are not much more removed from landing on these shores a short while ago.

Let's hope that calmer heads prevail on this issue. I really don't want our borders to look like East/West Berlin circa the Cold War era.

Friday, March 24, 2006

Friday's Random Ten

Friday’s Random Ten

Where you load up the MP3 player, hit "shuffle" and see what plays next.

1- Israel Kamakawiwo’ole - Hawai’ian Superman
2- Gene Pitney - Down In The Boondocks
3- Willie Nelson - Rainy Day Blues
4- Youssou N’Dour - Africa, Dream Again
5- Broadway Cast The Lion King - One By One
6- Jack Jones - Love With The Proper Stranger
7- Esquival - The 3rd Man Theme
8-Dionne Warwick - This Girl’s In Love With You
9- Bob James - Pure Magic
10- Donovan - Sunshine Superman

Bonus Track:

Budapester Klezmer Band - Di mame iz gagangen

HEY, I only play them, damn it!

Monday, March 20, 2006

Suit Filed In California Against Diebold

Courtesy of Brad Blog:

MEDIA ADVISORY
March 17, 2006, San Francisco, CA
Contact:
Martha DiSario, Pacific Communications: (415) 235-1230Deborah Goodson of
Howard Rice: (415) 399-7882

Dolores Huerta Joins California Voters Filing Suit to Halt Use or Purchase of Diebold Electronic Voting Systems in the State

Voter Action to Hold March 21st News Conference, 10:30 -11:30 AM, PST

Who:

Lowell Finley, Esq., Counsel for voter plaintiffs, Co-director of Voter Action, and expert on election law, election privatization, and electronic voting machine issues

John Eichhorst, Esq., Co-counsel, Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin

Holly Jacobson, Co-director, Voter Action

Dolores Huerta, Plaintiff, and social activist, co-founder, United Farm Workers

Bernice Kandarian, Plaintiff, and President of the Council of Citizens with Low Vision International

Voter Action, www.voteraction.org, is a not for profit organization dedicated to providing legal, research and logistical support for grassroots efforts to ensure the integrity of elections by guaranteeing that every citizen's vote is recorded and counted as intended. Voter Action led successful litigation in New Mexico to block purchase and use of the types of voting machines that are most prone to error and most vulnerable to tampering, and is now supporting similar efforts in numerous states across the country.

What:

Attorneys Lowell Finley and John Eichhorst, on behalf of more than 20 California voters including Dolores Huerta and Bernice Kandarian, will brief media on a legal action to be filed on Tuesday, March 21, in the Superior Court of the State of California, aimed at halting the use or purchase of Diebold electronic voting systems. Ms. Huerta and Ms. Kandarian will also speak and answer media questions.

Why:

Diebold's TSx touch screen voting system is a severe security risk, and does not accommodate all disabled voters as required by law. The Diebold system is difficult if not impossible to audit or recount, and has been proven vulnerable to malicious tampering in tests and studies. Diebold technology contains "interpreted" code, which is easily hacked, and illegal for voting systems in the State of California.

Where:

Howard Rice Nemerovski Canady Falk & Rabkin
Three Embarcadero Center, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111

###

Good. I was very concerned when Diebold was recently re-certified here in California, where I vote.

Sunday, March 19, 2006

Voting Is Now Closed

FURTHER UPDATE: What my weekly stats looked like thanks to the Salon hits.




UPDATE: Weclome Salon Readers. Feel free to peruse the blog, and drop a comment here and there! New posts are below.

The polls are now closed. Again, my thanks for the nomination of my post, An Ode To My Republican Ex Best Friend for Best Posts in the Lefty Blogosphere. It was my very first post on my blog, and was cross-posted at MyDD as my very first diary. I am honored that it was considered worthy of a nomination from MyDD.

Polls? Polls? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Polls

Rush was whining about how Democrats foolishly think all these numbers mean the rest of the country hates Bush like they do. Uh, dude, put the OxyContin down and back away from the mic...

Sometimes, there are those blogs you shouldn't read while you have a drink in one hand. (grins)

No "Frys" With That Motherboard

It turns out that my motherboard did not "fry." The fan stopped working and the alarm went off, but after checking the board, and buying a new fan, it started right up as if nothing happened at all. And, since that worked so well, we are getting another fan for the spare motherboard! I cannot believe my computer is still working as efficiently and as quickly as it has been these past four years. I'm probably going to get a new soundcard, though. Time to upgrade that mofo!

Singing An Old Song

From today's Face The Nation, courtesy of Think Progress:

SCHIEFFER: Mr. Vice President, all along the government has been very optimistic. You remain optimistic. But I remember when you were saying we’d be greeted as liberators, you played down the insurgency ten months ago. You said it was in its last throes. Do you believe that these optimistic statements may be one of the reasons that people seem to be more skeptical in this country about whether we ought to be in Iraq?

CHENEY: No, I think it has less to do with the statements we’ve made, which I think were basically accurate and reflect reality, than it does the fact that there is a constant sort of perception if you will that’s created because what is newsworthy is the carbomb in Baghdad, it’s not all the work that went on that day in 15 other provinces in terms of making progress in rebuilding Iraq.

First off ... the statements "were basically accurate and reflect reality?" It's been three fucking years! What reality is he speaking about? He said we'd be greeted as liberators, and that is absolutely not how we were greeted, it is not how we are now being greeted, and I'm pretty sure it's now how we'll continue to be greeted. He said last year the terrorists were in their last throes, and the terrorist activity is rising, not diminishing.

Next ... I'd like Cheney to rattle off work done in even five other provinces that would mark progress in rebuilding Iraq, let alone fifteen.

Once again, the media is to blame meme is trotted out.

Blogging The L.A. Marathon

The L.A. Marathon runs right out in front of my apartment. I live in the 6th Street and La Brea area, and it is between miles 19 and 20. Usually some radio station parks it in the gas station across the street (which is usually closed until the afternoon the day of the race) and plays music. It's a festive event all day in my area. The grandkid and I awoke at 3:30 a.m. to the sound of the parking guys towing away those errant vehicles who's owners forgot about the race. We went back to sleep, of course, but awoke around 6:00 a.m. when we could hear the one or two individuals already out cheering on the leading bicycle racers.

I have this really cool portable four-seater picnic table, so I made a quick pot of coffee, dressed the grandkid in warm clothes, grabbed the table and some toys, and the portable tv, and hoofed it out to the front.

We watched the leading handicapped cyclers go by, then the leading ladies go by, followed by the leading men. When it comes time for the pack, we pin on a number on the grandkid, and film him running a few blocks in the race!

It was great to see the ladies take the overall race.

Saturday, March 18, 2006

What Sectarian Violence?

In Saudi Arabia, the home of Wahhabi Islam, Shias are known as rafida, which means “rejectionists.” A highly pejorative term, it implies that Shias are outside Islam, and to Shias it is the equivalent of being called “nigger.” This is the same word Sunni radicals in Iraq and the leader of al Qaeda in Iraq, Abu Musab al Zarqawi, use to describe Shias. Saudi Arabia’s two million Shias have been persecuted, prevented from celebrating their festivals, and occasionally threatened with extermination. Saudi Arabia is also the main exporter of foreign fighters to the Iraqi jihad to fight both the Americans and the Shia “rafida” collaborators.


But, to hear Bush speak, it is Iran that is the main exporter of foreign fighters to the Iraqi jihad. So, which is it? Huh? Well?

Hat tip to Juan Cole. The above quote is from Nir Rosen. Read more of his rather lengthy piece entitled "On the Ground in Iraq - The roots of sectarian violence."

Friday, March 17, 2006

Cleaning Up The EPA

A federal appeals court blocked the Environmental Protection Agency on Friday from easing clean-air rules on aging power plants, refineries and factories, one of the regulatory changes that had been among the White House's environmental priorities.


Amen, to that. At last, some sanity. Read more, here.

Operation Swarmer A Fizzled Photo Op

But contrary to what many many television networks erroneously reported, the operation was by no means the largest use of airpower since the start of the war.("Air Assault" is a military term that refers specifically to transporting troops into an area.) In fact, there were no airstrikes and no leading insurgents were nabbed in an operation that some skeptical military analysts described as little more than a photo op. What’s more, there were no shots fired at all and the units had met no resistance, said the U.S. and Iraqi commanders.

Figures it was just a photo op! Is there nothing this administration won't turn into a photo op?

Christopher Allbritton has a good take on "Operation Overblown."

“Operation Swarmer” is really a media show. It was designed to show off the new Iraqi Army — although there was no enemy for them to fight. Every American official I’ve heard has emphasized the role of the Iraqi forces just days before the third anniversary of the start of the war. That said, one Iraqi role the military will start highlighting in the next few days, I imagine, is that of Iraqi intelligence. It was intel from the Iraqi military intelligence and interior ministry that the U.S. says prompted this Potemkin operation. And it will be the Iraqi intel that provides the cover for American military commanders to throw up their hands and say, “well, we thought bad guys were there.”

It’s hard to blame the military, however. Stations like Fox and CNN have really taken this and ran with it, with fancy graphics and theme music, thanks to a relatively slow news day. The generals here also are under tremendous pressure to show off some functioning Iraqi troops before the third anniversary, and I won’t fault them for going into a region loaded for bear. After all, the Iraqi intelligence might have been right.

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Hide The Salami, Tony Perkins' Style

Tony Perkins, FRC's president, said he'd support reducing unwanted pregnancies, so long as it doesn't include contraceptives, family-planning programs, or comprehensive education on sexual health.


Ok, that made me laugh and spill my drink.

Hat tip to The Carpetbagger Report.

I'll Raise Ya ...

The Senate voted Thursday to allow the national debt to swell to nearly $9 trillion, preventing a first-ever default on U.S. Treasury notes.

The bill passed by a 52-48 vote. The increase to $9 trillion represents about $30,000 for every man, woman and child in the United States. The bill now goes to President Bush for his signature.

[snip]

The debt limit will increase by $781 billion. It's the fourth such move — increasing the debt limit by a total of $3 trillion — since Bush took office five years ago.


I sure wish I could balance my personal budget by just raising the limits on my credit card debt.

I laugh every time I hear the Repugs talk about being the party of fiscal responsibility!

Still Trying To Connect The Dots?

Such bright contradictions were on display in Bush’s latest strategically bankrupt “plan” for victory: spending $3.3 billion to fight the improvised explosive devices(IEDs) that Bush now claims Iran is smuggling into Iraq — to the very Shiite forces that won the U.S.-engineered election and are positioned to form the first real post-Hussein government. The IEDs, mentioned a whopping 26 times in the president’s speech, have obviously come to replace that nonexistent WMD threat as the centerpiece of Bush’s Iraq policy. We will stop them, he says, by bumping anti-IED-related spending by a factor of 22, from $150 million in 2004 to $3.3 billion. “We’re putting the best minds in America to work on this effort,” Bush said.

Why not put a few of them to work on figuring how to extract the U.S. military from Iraq instead? After all, that is where all the IEDs happen to be exploding.

I posted earlier about Bush's new WMD threat, the IEDs, and how he's trying to connect them to Iran, much like he did with the 9/11-Saddam Hussein-Iraq-AlQeada thread. 26 times he mentioned the IEDs. Talk about slinging the propaganda!

The polls may be down for the big guy, and this time around, the American public will have to factor the "where have I heard that story before" into their thinking, but I am not of a mind to think that this will matter to our goverment currently in power. After all, it's clear that the majority of our elected representatives (and that includes those nasty DINO's) vote the corporate way, not the constituents' way.

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Knocking At The Green Zone's Back Door

US ambassador Zalmay Khalilzadattended a meeting with top Iraqi politicians to try to break the deadlock on forming a government.

Minister of Interior Bayan Jabr announced that a plot had been foiled to place hundreds of Sunni Arab troops actually loyal to the insurgency in position at the Green Zone and then to have them rush embassy offices and take diplomatic hostages. The Green Zone is a barricaded area of downtown Baghdad. There have been rumors for weeks that the Sunni Arab guerrillas were preparing to "rise up" and take the capital. This was probably the plan to which the rumor mongers were referring. Or, a more frightening thought: the rumors refer to yet another plot. Anyway, apparently the US and the new government barely dodged this bullet. It would have been horrible. But you do have the sense that with the siege of Baghdad going on, the Green Zone is becoming vulnerable and could ultimately fall.


Courtesy of Informed Comment. I'm sure the network daily news is just all over this. Not.

Just One Man's Opinion

Saddam allowed intrusive inspections only because of the threat of force. Containment of his regime would have meant continuous military deployment in neighbouring states and the no-fly zones; intensified economic sanctions; inspections coercive enough to withstand Saddam's intimidation and fraud; and the support of France and Russia. Even with personalities of greater competence than Hans Blix and higher morals than Jacques Chirac, that commitment would have been inconceivable. Of the permanent members of the security council, only the US and UK could have been relied on.

Um, that commitment would have been inconceivable? And it is more conceivable that thousands of the committed by way of their government in invading Iraq have died?

The failures of the occupation are legion: delayed elections, inadequate security, eroding infrastructure, complacency over the tortures at Abu Ghraib, and a heavy death toll among Iraqi civilians and our troops. But had we allowed Saddam's regime to persist, in defiance of its obligations under 17 UN security council resolutions, the consequences would have been an unalloyed catastrophe.

I'll have to write that off as just another ill informed opinion.

Against those disastrous scenarios, there are clear advances. We no longer have to bear one major risk: a psychopathic despot overcoming a porous sanctions regime, and using oil sales to pay for resumed WMD production.

That's true. We bear many more risks concerning psychopathic despots. And now that these psychopathic despots realize this country is maxed out, just what exactly would our commitment be?

Dispensation To Eat Meat

O'Leary will enjoy his corned beef on Friday with a clear conscience -- thanks to a special dispensation from another Irish-American, Archbishop Timothy Dolan of Milwaukee.

Dolan is among dozens of bishops -- from Portland, Maine, and Green Bay, Wis., to Arlington, Va., and Boston -- granting one-day dispensations from Lenten rules that prohibit Roman Catholics from eating meat on Fridays to observe the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. In many cases, the bishops are asking for a similar day of penance in exchange for relaxing the rules this Friday.

Whew. I'm glad that's been straightened out! Of course, how many real Irish actually make corned beef and cabbage specifically on St. Paddy's day? The Kelly clan in my family usually went out to dinner on that day, at a fancy restaurant, and we all ordered steak.

He Said, He Said

President Bush said Monday insurgents in Iraq were trying to ignite a civil war by escalating violence and warned there will be more "chaos and carnage in the days and months to come."

Oh yeah? I seem to remember Dick Cheney saying otherwise, oh, um, about a year ago.

The insurgency in Iraq is "in the last throes," Vice President Dick Cheney says, and he predicts that the fighting will end before the Bush administration leaves office.

Didn't that group used to refer to this phenomena as "flip flopping?"

Damon, You Silly "N...a"

Wayans, whose application was submitted early last year, could argue that the word he hopes to trademark, "Nigga," is different, says Todd Boyd, a professor of critical studies at the University of Southern California and author of the book "The New H.N.I.C.: The Death of Civil Rights and the Reign of Hip Hop."

"I don't think it's the same thing," Boyd says. "Hip-hop has redefined the word. It can mean a number of things. It can be a term of admiration. It can be a term of recognition."

Earlier this month, for example, a mostly white jury in Boulder, Colo., cleared a man of ethnic intimidation for using the N-word during a fight in which he broke a black man's jaw, but some younger jurors didn't think the word was offensive because it's so conversational in hip-hop culture.

Hip hop has "redefined" the word? I am not sure I agree with that. Redefined it to mean, what? Is it "redefined" like, say, the word "bitch?" Has hip hop redefined bitch?

This is silly, but, so is Wayans.

Tuesday, March 14, 2006

The Balancing Act

I'd bet most of us have better resumes than most of our critics.


Ok, that made me laugh and spill my drink.

At The Risk Of Our Future Standards ...

"The prospective increase in the budget deficit will place at risk future living standards of our country," [Ben] Bernanke said. "As a result, I think it would be very desirable to take concrete steps to lower the prospective path of the deficit."

No shit, Sherlock. But, it ain't gonna happen on Bush's watch, you can take that prediction to the bank.

No Proof Of Bush Claim Iran Supplying Iraq With IED Components

I posted a week ago about Bush's new lies about Iran providing Iraq with components to make IEDs. Well, it appears I was right!

The top U.S. military officer said on Tuesday the United States does not have proof that Iran's government is responsible for Iranians smuggling weapons and military personnel into Iraq.

President George W. Bush said on Monday components from Iran were being used in powerful roadside bombs used in Iraq, and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week that Iranian Revolutionary Guard personnel had been inside Iraq.

Asked whether the United States has proof that Iran's government was behind these developments, Marine Corps Gen. Peter Pace, chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Pentagon briefing, "I do not, sir."

There you have it. Proof, not that at this point in time we aren't swimming in pools of proof concerning the Bush Administration lies, but proof nonetheless that the claim of Iran supplying Iraq with components to build IEDs is not supported by any factual evidence.

Isn't anyone else just as fed up with this crap, as I am?

Once Again, Bush Claims Media Aids And Abets "The Enemy"

During his speech about Iraq on Monday, President Bush criticized a newspaper article that he said revealed sensitive information about the Pentagon's effort to combat improvised explosive devices, the makeshift roadside bombs responsible for thousands of injuries and deaths. White House officials later said that Bush was referring to a Feb. 12 report in the Los Angeles Times.

"Within five days of the publication, using details from that article, the enemy had posted instructions for defeating this new technology on the Internet," Bush said. "We cannot let the enemy know how we're working to defeat them."

[snip]

Even before The Times published its article, the technology was featured in several news reports. Last year, NBC News broadcast a segment about the neutralizers, showing video footage of the device detonating improvised explosives in its path.

This is all that Bush ever does; make speeches full of lies. It's like he has his own movie script, and he's not been alerted that the scenes have changed, or that there is a real audience in the studio. There's not a shred of evidence to back up that statement, and there generally is never a shred of evidence to pretty much every thing this man says.

Always referencing "the enemy" and labelling the act that he's pissed off about as "helping the enemy." Everyone is the fucking enemy to this guy and his minions. No wonder the Dubai thing bit him in the ass so unexpectedly!

I Spy

Documents released today by the American Civil Liberties Union reveal that the Federal Bureau of Investigations has indeed monitored political groups solely on the basis that they opposed a U.S.-led war.

[snip]

"Something is seriously wrong in how our government determines who and what constitutes terrorism when peace activists find themselves targeted," remarked Jim Kleissler, Executive Director of the Thomas Merton Center for Peace & Justice.

This really galls me, but what do you expect from this administration? Bubble boy gives speeches to hand-picked partisan crowds, and his staff harass and toss out anyone expressing an opposing view, even if it's on a bumper sticker or a T-shirt. It's not a stretch to believe that Bubble boy is using the FBI to harass peace activists under the guise of weeding out terrorist threats.

I Fried My Motherboard

Yup, that's right. I knew I should have replaced the processor fan, but noooooooooooooooooo. It was actually faulty for nearly a year, so maybe I just had a deathwish for the computer all along.

I have three computers at home. One is a laptop, a Fujitsu, that my daughter uses. I purchased it at first for my 3 year old grandchild, who is rather proficient on the little tykes' sites, such as PBSKIDS, NOGGIN, etc. However, he still liked to spit on the keyboard, and while that is not a problem with the PC keyboard, it was a major problem with the laptop. So, my daughter and my grandchild switched out computers. The other PC is a quick put-together with a Pentium 4 processor operating at 2 gigs, with 256 k of RAM. It was a cheapie that cost around $300 to build. (My friend actually put together about 10 of these models and sold them for $300 to $350 apiece, just around the time, a few years back, when PC's were dropping drastically in price).

My pride and joy, however, is the "super computer" my friend and I put together back in early 2002. That's the one that I fried the motherboard. That has an AMD Athalon processor, only 1 gig, but I also had a gig of RAM, so it was a fast mother fucker. I am not totally 100% certain it's fried, but when the fire alarm in your computer goes off, things are not good!

So, I was dealing witht the worst case scenario here. Four years is an awfully long time for one PC to be operating efficiently and effectively, and my computer has certainly stood up well these past years. So, upgrading is a possibility. After all, it's just a motherboard, and all I would have to upgrade would be the memory, since my current puter uses SD and I'm sure a new board would use DDR. However, my tech friend has the exact same motherboard on a puter just sitting somewhere, unused, so there is the possibility of just replacing it for the same, and using the same memory chips. No upgrade, but possibly another four years of usage. About all I ever have had to change has been hardware. I'm on my third hardrive, and instead of replacing this last one, I just put in a second hard drive. I have a decent tower, an Antec, with lots of room inside. It is probably time, though, to upgrade the rewritable CD drive and the DVD player.

What I love most about the computer is the sound system. A Soundblaster card, 5.0 surround sound speakers with bass, and it beats out my regular home stereo system! Plus, I have nearly 10,000 MP3 song titles on the hard drive (about 30 gigs worth). I'll miss my music the most until I get the puter fixed. Granted, I have most of the songs backed up on disc, but having the sound come out of these dinky speakers is not worth the hastle to insert the disc.

So, there will be sporadic posting until after Thursday, when I should be able to put in the new motherboard and see if it solves the problem, or if it will require me purchasing a new and different kind of motherboard.

Monday, March 13, 2006

And What Has Your Corporate Representative Done For You, Lately?

This Financial Times story is truly incredible: Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff is once again going out in public and demanding America prioritize corporate profits over national security. It would be one thing if this was coming from the Secretary of Commerce - but for America's top security official to keep running around saying this kind of thing really brings up questions about where his focus is. And remember -this is the second time in three weeks he's made statements like this.

The FT's headline really says it all about his thinking: "US focus on risk ‘poses threat to economy.'" The story goes on to quote Chertoff opposing Congressional efforts to make sure all containers are inspected because he says it would supposedly stop all commerce. That's right folks: under the Bush administration, America's top security officials care about one thing and one thing only: making the President's corporate campaign donors happy.

That is really the number one problem with the government today. It no longer represents the populace that elected it; it represents corporations that fill the coffers. Period. In every fucking facet of this government, corporate interests far outweigh what the American people want.

What gets me the most right now, is that poll after poll after poll clearly shows the American public stating one view, and the elected government officials voicing a contrary policy. It's as if the politicians know that they have greased the wheels of corporate dominion, and that, coupled with Diebold's help here and there, will keep them right where they are. Regardless of whether the American people want them there.

Clooney To Lily Livered Democrats - "FY"

"Just look at the way so many Democrats caved in the runup to the war. In 2003, a lot of us were saying, where is the link between Saddam and Bin Laden? What does Iraq have to do with 9/11? We knew it was bulls—.

"Which is why it drives me crazy to hear all these Democrats saying, 'We were misled.' It makes me want to shout, 'F— you, you weren't misled. You were afraid of being called unpatriotic.'"

That's pretty much it, in a nutshell. (Thank you, George Clooney). I have the same complaints with the Democratic party, and those that voted for the war, as well as many, many, many other detrimental and unpopular programs and bills. Democrats in name only, like our illustrious Senator Feinstein (D-CA). I'm totally prepared to vote for a Republican this time around. I'd rather have a Republican not screwing up the "numbers," than a DINO, really screwing up the "numbers."

Dump Bush

As many of you can see, I have not posted in a good week. Stuff at home to do, and stuff at work to do. Nothing major, just busy.

I get into these lulls occasionally, especially when the news is so overwhelmingly obvious concerning this administration's fuck-ups and the cover-ups. After a while, the obvious is just too obvious to write about anymore.

And now, on the eve of the third anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, all Bush can think of doing is traversing the country giving more speeches about how peachy keen everything is. Our economy is healthy, America is prosperous, we're winning the war on terror, yadda yadda yadda.

There is only so much bullshit one can take before it starts coming back out. I'll be back to posting once I've taken a big Bush dump.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

What Democracy? Not In New Orleans

The folks over at Think Progress raise an interesting point. Just why can't the displaced former residents of New Orleans vote in the upcoming elections? If the Iraqis living in the United States were able to participate in the elections in Iraq, why is it that African Americans living in AMERICA cannot vote in their own city's election?

The upcoming New Orleans mayoral primary faces logistical problems because “tens of thousands of evacuees are still scattered across the country and eligible to cast ballots in the April 22 election, either by mail or at satellite polling places around the state.”

An estimated 75 percent of the New Orleans Parish’s displaced voters are African-American, and serious questions remain about how African-American voters will be adequately represented in the primary.

The NAACP estimates that “66 percent of those displaced are outside of Louisiana,” but a federal judge last month refused to “order Louisiana officials to provide out-of-state satellite polling places for displaced voters” in the primary. Instead, over 700,000 former city residents will receive “information packets” about how to vote by absentee ballot. (Worse, the address the city has on file may be unreliable.)

In response, local leaders have wondered why Iraqis living in the U.S. were given this right, yet African-Americans are not. “[Louisiana] had all kinds of excuses why that couldn’t happen,” New Orleans City Council President Oliver M. Thomas Jr. said. “But the Iraqi people voted [at satellite offices]. Why can’t we do that for all of our voters?

Is the irony of this situation not apparent to all? Are the racist connotations not obvious? The bullshit from this administration about spreading democracy abroad is clear when these types of voting restrictions are applied to African Americans in this country.

Marching On To Iran

Here we go again.

U.S. military and intelligence officials tell ABC News that they have caught shipments of deadly new bombs at the Iran-Iraq border.

They are a very nasty piece of business, capable of penetrating U.S. troops' strongest armor.

What the United States says links them to Iran are tell-tale manufacturing signatures — certain types of machine-shop welds and material indicating they are built by the same bomb factory.

Ummm, uh, where I have I heard that before.

Another way Brian Ross is failing to be in any manner "investigative" is in failing to find out or inform the public that this isn't any kind of exclusive - it is actually old news from
way back in October last year
.

Back then, the British media were full of the accusations that improved IED's using motion detectors as triggers were being sent to Iraq from Iran. They were being sent, according to British claims, to the Sadr militia - an organisation that the US has gone out of it's way to placate - but that too isn't mentioned by Ross. Just as now, absolutely no evidence was brought forward to show that the Iranian government were at all involved... and then the kerfuffle suddenly stopped. Why?

Well as I wrote at the time, it was discovered that the new, deadly IED's were using a British design that had been stupidly given to the IRA by British intelligence and then passed around various terror groups the IRA were allied with. Major egg on faces - story dropped.

I am dumbfounded that this administration would do exactly the same thing again, only this time it isn't uranium tubes, it's IED's. And it isn't Iraq, it's Iran.

About the only thing that is different is that the American public is not so compliant as it was back in 2003 in the lead up to the war on Iraqis. I doubt this administration will be able to muster the popular support for another war based on dubious charges.

More likely, though, is that Bush is looking to just send some bombs over there, specific strikes at specific targets. There's no mention of invasion like with Iraq. However, a move of that nature will completely blow up in our faces, and can only be the start of WWIII, for Iran will not sit down and take it. And by forcing Israel and the US's hand, who will both respond to any aggression by Iran with overkill, you will have a major world war erupting, one in which there will certainly be no coalition of the willing on the side of the US and Israel.

At least, that's my dire prediction.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Bolton Ready To Nuke Iran

The US ambassador to the United Nations, John Bolton, has told British MPs that military action could bring Iran's nuclear programme to a halt if all diplomatic efforts fail. The warning came ahead of a meeting today of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which will forward a report on Iran's nuclear activities to the UN security council.


Doesn't this just scare the shit out of you on a Monday morning?

However the parliamentary foreign affairs committee, visiting Washington last week, encountered sharply different views within the Bush administration. The most hawkish came from Mr Bolton. According to Eric Illsley, a Labour committee member, the envoy told the MPs: "They must know everything is on the table and they must understand what that means. We can hit different points along the line. You only have to take out one part of their nuclear operation to take the whole thing down."

Sunday, March 05, 2006

AP clarifies what Bush was told about levees

So, it appears the latest spin by the White House is the use of the word "overrun" as opposed to "breach" with regard to the levees in New Orleans, and that wonderful video that exposed Bush for the lazy son of a bitch that he is. Apparently the White House is sticking to its story that "no one could have anticipated the levees breaching," and they have put out the new spin that he was told (on the video) that the levees would be "overrun" not "breached." That is supposed to support the President's statement that "no one could have anticipated the levees breaching."

What does it matter whether "overtopped" or "breached" was used. The fact is that thousands of folks who otherwise would not have died, did lose their lives; with hundreds of thousands displaced and homeless. For Bush apologists to grab this thin straw, and use it to excuse his sleeping on his watch, is the apex of hypocrisy. Humans, fellow Americans, died, and others are homeless. Could their deaths had been prevented had Bush not continued his vacation, attending birthday bashes, or doing photo ops. with a guitar. Those are the facts we should be discussing, not whether one word or the other was used to warn Bush. And I thought blind sychophancy does not exist in America!!

Great comment over at USA Today, where they "clarify" what Bush was "told."

This administration just can't take the blame for anything. This new "clarification" just turns my stomach, and on a Sunday morning, no less.

Saturday, March 04, 2006

Not Jumping On THAT Bandwagon

I can't see glorifying Michael Brown. He shouldn't have been in the job. He screwed up in a lot of different ways. He then carried the administration's water in trying to pin the blame on the locals, what must be a mortal sin in a FEMA Director. But he does get some credit for coming clean now and spilling at
least some of the beans. And the beans he's spilled so far show that he's hardly the most blameworthy figure in the administration's shameful and pitiful response to the disaster that befell the Gulf Coast.

I agree with Josh. All that has really happened is the video indicated that Brown wasn't totally asleep at the wheel, especially when compared to Bush and others. And, it confirmed what we already knew; that Bush is incompetent.

Thursday, March 02, 2006

Asleep at the wheel, and driving the country into a brick wall at 100 MPH

From The Carpetbagger Report:

The lead headline at CNN.com right now reads, "Transcript shows governments underestimated Katrina." That's false. The transcript shows that the various government agencies recognized exactly how serious Katrina was, but also shows a detached president who was confident that everything would work out fine because, well, he said so.

That is exactly the point. The only people underestimating anything about Katrina were the president and his minions. No wonder this government refuses to release any relevant information about any relevant issue concerning just exactly what they were doing. Because, as this video shows, the president was told exactly what to excpect by way of damage to New Orleans from Katrina before the storm hit. And this president went merrily on his way, in the opposite direction, to continue on with his vacation. And then comes his famous excuse about "nobody" ever imagining "that the levees would break."

Liar, liar, liar, liar. And the idiot was just on national television two days before this video came out, reminding the American people that "nobody ever imagined the levees would break." Just in time to put it back fresh. The video even made it on our local news after the basketball game (9ish), something that generally is passed over by those corporate owned media outlets.

Let that sink in. The president was thoroughly briefed about the impending hurricane and the potential damage. They even discussed the Superdome and whether the roof would hold. And, despite all of this, the president just blows the country off and partys on. HE COULD GIVE A SHIT about the people of New Orleans. THEY WERE NOT A PART OF HIS BASE. And, now with elections in New Orleans coming up shortly, a large percentage of the Ninth Ward will not be voting.

Everything about Katrina stinks to the high heavens. This administration has passed the buck around so many times its worth only ten cents now. And at every juncture, Bush put forth his excuse that the damage was so accute that it was not possible for him to have expected it, let alone be prepared for it. And there you have it. The video. Every aspect of the anticipated damage by Katrina was explained to Bush, some of it in very stark, plain and angry language.

Since Bush claims he was never informed of how desparate the conditions would be, and we know he was present when all that information was discussed, one can only conclude the "my pet goat" syndrome kicked in.

This is not a myth. This administration is truly incompetent. Asleep at the wheel, and driving the country into a brick wall at 100 MPH.