By why are those tactics suddenly not working? If anything, one could have expected that equating Democrats with anti-American, vaguely foreign, radical subversion would have been more potent this year than any other -- given that the Democratic presidential nominee is a previously unknown, black politician from Chicago with a mixed African and Arab name, a portion of his childhood in Indonesia, and substantial parts of even his immediate family still in Kenya to this day. But that line of attack has gotten Republicans nowhere -- other than sinking further into the mud of defeat.
There are numerous reasons one could cite, none entirely satisfying on their own: High levels of economic insecurity -- and an intense belief that the country is fundamentally off course -- have made voters immune to ancillary character attacks. The GOP has been ceaselessly deploying these character-smearing techniques for decades, rendering them stale, overused and drenched with the stench of past-era obsolescence. The country has so turned against George Bush and his party that nothing they say can resonate. Voter demographics are changing, with voters becoming younger and more diverse and less vested in GOP patriotism iconography. The Obama campaign has been far more adept at aggressively engaging these attacks, rather than merely defensively denying them as past campaigns have done. The combination of an angry McCain and an unapologetically extremist Palin makes those attacks more difficult to soften.
Perhaps most significantly of all, the views typically attributed to Democrats and liberals to justify the "unpatriotic" and "radical" labels -- particularly those in national security -- are now views shared by the majority of Americans. I thought one of the most illustrative moments of the campaign was when Sarah Palin, in her debate with Joe Biden, snidely accused Obama of wanting to wave the "white flag of surrender in Iraq." That taunt -- an old, reliable favorite GOP trope -- fell flat on its face. How do you convince Americans that Democrats are weak, America-hating radicals by virtue of views which a majority of Americans themselves embrace?
We're gradually seeing not only the demise of the right-wing faction that has dominated the Republican Party for decades, but also the death of their ugliest and most toxic tactics. When numerous right-wing figures crawl across one's television set desperately denying and abjectly apologizing for attacks on the patriotism of Democrats and liberals, that is potent evidence that, at least as a matter of political rhetoric, a genuine sea-change is taking place.
I started this blog because of my disgust over the way the Republican voice was coming across -- with lies, anger, hatred and vengeance against anyone not white, male, heterosexual, American and Christian. Period. Any deviation from that labeled you many things, none of which bore any resemblance to reality, nor were they founded upon truthful tenets. The first four years of the Bush administration was tempered in some fashion for about a year right after 9/11. But, then, it went downhill with a force of passion that was lapped up by a majority of Americans that to this day, I am still dumbfounded with the astonishing number of people (apparently around 23%) in America that still believe Saddam Hussein and Iraq had anything to do with the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon!
Sadly, there are still those people (somehow still stuck at the 23% range) that believe in Bush, believe in the policies of hate and war, and who continue to tell themselves that they represent the majority view of the American public.
They do not. Thankfully, this election will shock them into the caged animals that they have always been. Not human beings imbued and transformed by the spirit of godliness and humanity, but whimpering, cowardly old hyenas living with their own dung.
7 comments:
Some point after the election I'll get into this more when we can see the shifts, but I can't, not yet, agree with Greenwald. Repugs may consider McCain comparable to the H.W. Bush & Dole defeats, that they can't head the ticket with a candidate who doesn't unify all the wingnut wings. Combine that with a perfect storm of bad news, & such a great Democratic campaign & maybe this year was a lost cause anyway.
Look for Repugs to groom a more populist version of George W. They wasted Palin, because she was definitely groomable if they'd given her a keynote address & went to work on her for the next four years like Rove did on George in Texas.
This year was more than a lost cause, in my opinion. There was/is/has been a pattern of turning our democratic way of life into a dictatorship run by the rich, under the guise of democracy as commercialism and the oft used free market concept. Obama speaks more for the people, and the experiment by the right wingers to overtake the supposed conservative party, I believe, is over. Their goals are repugnant to real true American patriots, who despite their religious orientation, believe in a God, and who despite their sexual orientation, believe in family values and fairness.
I think the Rove Experiment years have had their peak, and it is all downhill for those extremists.
Carrie, I hope you are correct. I also have to agree with Bob a bit... I mean not only did the groomed W get elected president, HE DID IT TWICE!! That's what is really depressing about the whole situation.
Can I get a Guinness??
I gotta go, Carlo
Beer this early in the morning, Carlo? ---> |_|o Here's a full mug for ya.
BTW, I subscribe to the view that Bush never won either election. And, if you are paying attention to the reports of people who are voting early THIS election, the touch screen machines (the old Diebold ones that are now ES&S iVotronic machines), these machines continue to switch Democratic votes to Republican votes right in front of the voter's very eyes!
Bush never won either election, and the American public was "bushwinked" into believing that it was patently impossible to steal an election in that fashion. But as we are sadly uncovering, the truth is that those machines were designed purposefully to steal the elections. Don't forget that the president of Diebold in 20904 said he was "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." And we all know how that panned out.
I believe Americans are tired of being taken advantage of by the few. They are tired of footing the bill for the corporate takeover of their country, and they are tired of lobbyists running this country. Most of all, I believe they are tired of being told that "God" hates most people -- an attribute of God I find ridiculous, as hate is an emotion only homosapiens appear to be able to experience and project.
Vote early, and vote with integrity. Ask for a paper ballot to be sure your vote counts, and make sure to physically watch that ballot dropped into the box before you leave your polling place.
Typo Alert! 2004, not 20904 (ha ha). My bad.
As to start time, I have always said, "It's noon somewhere..." (or 5:00 or whatever the acceptable start time is). In addition, one cannot drink all day if one does not start in the morning.
On a more serious note, I did send in for an early ballot just to see how it works. I'll vote early using it, although the fear of having been purged from a voting list seems unlikely at my precinct. In Wisconsin we can register on the day of voting, and being quite rural here, everyone knows everyone and it would be unheard of to have trouble voting here. We actually got an electronic machine last year but I continue to use paper.
We continue to lag slightly behind society at large, but that may not be a bad thing......
I have already received my mail in ballot. I am not interested this election in waiting in line for hours, espcially since I have a trial on 11/4, damn it!
Post a Comment